Missing the Point

This started as a comment to Bob’s post below - “Dying Poor”
- but my comment began to run long and I think works better as a regular
The NBER Working Paper (scroll to link "Were they Prepared for Retirement?") finds that 46% of people die with less than $10,000 in assets.  We already know that about 50% of taxpayers have so little income that they pay no income tax.  So is the NBER Paper helpful or even surprising information? I say no.  In fact, I think it misses
the point.  Here’s what I think is
the point.
Most long-term poor people have no significant income or assets before age 65; the same
is true after age 65; and the same is true when they die.
OK then, what would be helpful to the long-term poor?  I think a wider acceptance of the things one must do to avoid poverty in the first place, would be helpful.  These things are
easier said than done, but they are no mystery.  Search any variant of
"how not to be poor" and you will find them.  For example, here is
some extremely useful, fundamental advice:
"Avoiding long-term poverty is not rocket science. First, graduate from
high school. Second, get married before you have children, and stay married.
Third, work at any kind of job, even one that starts out paying the minimum
wage. And, finally, avoid engaging in criminal behavior. If you graduate from
high school today with a B or C average, in most places in our country there's
a low-cost or financially assisted post-high-school education program available
to increase your skills."
Why are such simple ideas ignored?  I think because (1) the ideas require
a quality that has become uncomfortable for many modern Americans--personal
responsibility (2) the ideas don't fit the popular notion that in most cases
government assistance is necessary for most poor people, and (3) the ideas are not
intellectualized in some professorial research paper.
But even a professorial research paper can fail to be useful by missing the
point, as I think this NBER Working Paper does.
This brings us to the connection with insurance - at least conceptually. 
That concept is the failure to be useful by missing the point.
Our country's health policy leadership  - with notable exceptions - has typically missed
the point by continually failing to distinguish medical insurance from medical
care.  Somehow, it's all "healthcare" to them.  But the two
are very different, and the difference matters. 
Medical insurance is expensive because medical care is
expensive.  The cost of medical
insurance is rising because the cost of medical care is rising.  The cost of medical care is clearly the
more fundamental problem.  But our
health policy leadership insists on “solving” that problem with federal
subsidies – that is, with insurance.
Our leadership has missed the point about financing medical care.  They misdiagnose the problem and they
mislead the rest of us.  This is no
way to lead a nation and it’s no way to solve the problem.   America’s ineffective but highly
expensive medical care system over the past 50 years is ample proof of this.  Obamacare is just another highly-expensive
non-solution, born of missing the point.   


This information is solely for informational and educational purposes only. The publication of this information does not constitute the practice of medicine, family planning, child psychology, marriage counseling and this information does not replace the advice of your physician or other health care or mental health care provider. Neither the owners or employees of NaturalFamilyOnline.com or the author(s) of site content take responsibility for any possible consequences from any treatment, procedure, exercise, dietary modification, application of medication or any other action involving the care of yourself or any family members which results from reading this site. It is always best to speak with your primary health care provider before engaging in any form of self treatment. Additional information contained in our Legal Statement

What does your weekly dinner look like?
The whole family dines together at home
The whole family dines together at a restaurant
Parents and children eat separately
Whoever is around eats together
Every family member for themselves!
Total votes: 5755